Critical Intervention Services, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a resentencing court must consider the defendant’s argument that he no longer qualifies as a career offender
• discussing the relationship between Concepcion and, inter alia, United States v. Easter, 975 F.3d 318 (3d Cir. 2020)
• “Where a district court finds a defendant eligible for a sentence modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) but either declines to reduce the sentence or imposes a reduced sentence with which the movant is not satisfied, we review for abuse of discretion.”
• requiring consideration of a movant’s non-frivolous arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).