Criswell v. Brinks Signal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “What the Commission has done, in effect, is ignored or rejected the hearing officer’s findings of fact without determining that they are not supported by competent, substantial evidence. This it cannot do.”
• where hearing officer concluded discharge was not related to handicap, but was due to bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary for performance of job, Commission could not reject that finding and substitute its own finding, because CSE supported it
• whether termination of handicapped police officer was unlawful employment practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).