Crist v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in the context of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea “[a] defendant’s bald statements that simply contradict what he said at his plea allocution are not sufficient grounds to withdraw the guilty plea”
• rejecting facial challenge and holding that VICAR \satisfies the substantial effect requirement\ because it \incorporates a jurisdictional element requiring a nexus between the offense in question and interstate commerce\
• a significant question as to voluntariness was required, the defendants having moved to withdraw their pleas on the ground that they had been pressured or forced to plead guilty
• “A defendant’s bald statements that simply contradict what he said at his plea allocution are not sufficient grounds to withdraw the guilty plea.”
• “A defendant’s bald statements that simply contradict what he said at his plea allocution are not sufficient grounds to withdraw the guilty plea.”
• \The substantial effect requirement is satisfied when criminal statutes contain a jurisdictional element. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).