Crist v. Republic of Turkey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs had not met the baseline entitlement to jurisdictional discovery because the “[p]laintiffs’ request for jurisdictional discovery provide[d the] court with nothing more than conjecture and surmise . . . .”
• rejecting the plaintiffs discovery request because it provided the court with nothing more than “conjecture and surmise”
• rejecting the plaintiff’s discovery request because it provided the court with 10 nothing more than “conjecture and surmise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).