Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/3/1997

Crisman v. Crisman

Citations

85 Wash. App. 15
931 P.2d 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that statute of limitations is tolled until a plaintiff knows, or through reasonable diligence should know, of her injury
stating that when the delay in discovering the basis for a claim “was not caused by the plaintiff sleeping on his rights, the court may apply the discovery rule”
as power of attorney, agent becomes a fiduciary to the principal, bound to act with utmost good faith and loyalty
agent has duty to fully disclose all facts relating to his interest in and his actions involving the affected property
a plaintiff alleging fraudulent concealment may affirmatively plead and prove the nine elements of fraud or show that the defendant breached an affirmative duty to disclose a material fact
affirmative act of misrepresentation or concealment subject to three-year rule of RCW 4.16.080(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.