Skip to main content
· 9/11/1981

Crimmins v. Simonds

Citations

  • 636 P.2d 478
  • 1981 Utah LEXIS 874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the existence of several breaches of a restrictive covenant does not justify refusal of enforcement unless the character , of the neighborhood has changed”
  • noting property owners’ pro-tectable interest in enforceability of covenants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Maughan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.