Crighton v. State, Dept. of Labor & Indus. Relations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board’s determination that a veteran’s conduct was fraudulent and prevented a waiver of indebtedness is a factual finding
• holding that the Board's determination that a veteran's conduct was fraudulent and prevented a waiver of indebtedness is a factual finding
• holding that the Board’s determination of “veteran status” is a question of fact that is subject to the “clearly erroneous” standard of review
• indicating that the Board’s determination of veteran status is a question of fact subject to the “clearly erroneous” standard of review
• affirming the Board's finding that two and a half months of AWOL out of nine months of service was willful and persistent misconduct
• discussing how contemporaneous medical findings may be given more probative weight than contrary evidence offered years later, long after the fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).