Crigger v. Allied Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the existence of corporate termination review mechanisms belied the defendant’s contention that the termination decision communicated in the notice of termination was irreversible
• noting that there was no evidence that the plaintiffs rights under its dealership agreement had been diminished until the effective date of the termination
• noting that the presumption in favor 15 of such awards serves a “deterrent function by discouraging unnecessary involvement by 16 the court in discovery”
• “When a party’s conduct during discovery 5 necessitates its opponent’s bringing motions which otherwise would have been 6 unnecessary, the court may properly order it to pay the moving party’s expenses…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).