Crider v. STATE, DHRS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining in detail why HRS must adopt rules to implement Florida's voluntary participation in subchapter XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.
• income is to be determined from when it is received, not after it is reduced by payments under a spousal support order
• income is to be determined from when it is received, not after it is reduced by payments under a spousal support order
• “available income” for Medicaid eligibility included support ordered paid to spouse under temporary court order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).