Crider v. Highmark Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a delegation found in a separate service agreement, which is not referred to in the Plan documents, is not valid under 29 U.S.C. § 1105(c)(1)
• “Even if Teper had not cited the DOT as part of its basis for denying plaintiff’s claim, it would nonetheless have been appropriate for this court to take judicial notice of the DOT and SC in this ERISA context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).