Skip to main content
· 7/31/2000

Crichfield v. Grand Wailea Co.

Citations

  • 6 P.3d 349
  • 93 Haw. 477
  • 2000 Haw. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the Supreme Court construes a statute, its foremost obligation is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature
  • holding that when the Supreme Court construes a statute, its foremost obligation is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature
  • reviewing legislative history to confirm court’s holding based on statute’s clear and unambiguous language
  • declining to construe recreational use immunity statute to create a universal defense to commercial establishments where there is a recreational and commercial component to the establishment's operation
  • declining to construe recreational use immunity statute to create a universal defense to commercial establishments where there is a recreational and commercial component to the establishment’s operation
  • determining that there was a question of fact as to whether the injured party and her husband were on the hotel grounds for a commercial purpose, patronizing the hotel café, or were there for purely recreational purposes such as viewing the hotel grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, Nakamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.