· 4/15/1906
Crice v. Illinois Ins.
Citations
- 122 Ky. 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a pre- answer motion to dismiss” on timeliness grounds “may be granted only if it is clear on the face of the complaint that the statute of limitations has run” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
- dismissing slander claim against corporation where plaintiff alleged \no more than a conclusory allegation that the statements were made by 'an agent of [the corporation]' \
- denying motion to dismiss conversion claim as time-barred because factual development was needed as to when the alleged conversion actually took place
- denying motion to dismiss conversion claim as time-barred because factual development was needed as to when the alleged conversion actually took place
- rejecting mortgagee’s equitable arguments that mortgagor benefitted from the mortgage, and that mortgagor made various representations that induced reliance on its authority to execute the mortgage
- assignments are enforceable unless there is clear language that an improper assignment will be 10 void.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Settle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.