Cricchio v. Pennisi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that because the recipient has assigned rights to the state to recover medical expenses from a third party, and the state is subro-gated to the recipient’s rights, the settlement proceeds are the property of the third party which are owed to the state
• reasoning that because the recipient has assigned rights to the state to recover medical expenses from a third party, and the state is subrogated to the recipient's rights, the settlement proceeds are the property of the third party which are owed to the state
• ‘‘[b]ecause the injured Medicaid recipient has assigned its recovery rights to [the New York Department of Social Services (DSS
• a case that did not involve an infant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).