Crews v. Hollenbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a similar statute was created to protect individuals during excavation and the utilities themselves from destruction
• discussing the trial court’s decision to grant both motions for summary judgment which were filed in writing by two parties in advance of a hearing, as well as the oral motions for summary judgment submitted by three other parties at the hearing
• discussing the trial court’s decision to grant both motions for summary judgment which were filed in writing by two parties in advance of a hearing, as well as the oral motions for summary judgment submitted by three other parties at the hearing
• gas line repair team foreman assumed risk of explosion and fire associated with natural gas leak when he accepted position, twenty years prior to injury
• “Courts will not be swayed by a plaintiffs subjective denial that he or she did not comprehend the extent of a dearly obvious danger.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).