Crew v. Advics Mfg. Ohio, Inc.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 328

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in determining that the client of a staffing agency was the plaintiff-appellant's employer for purposes of workers' compensation immunity as the client had the right to control the manner and means in which appellant performed his day-to-day tasks. Moreover, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the client-employer because it complied with the relevant workers' compensation statues, thereby entitling it to immunity under R.C. 4123.74.