Crestwood Shops, L.L.C. v. Hilkene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when a party accepted an offer the party restated the offer and clarified the effect of the contract so that the party’s acceptance was a valid acceptance and not a counter-offer
• “While the discussion in Cook refers to violation of a statute, we note that other cases include violations of ordinances as a possible ground for application of the negligence per se doctrine.”
• Where one party “makes her offer [in an email] and states that she is available only through email” and the other party accepts the offer by responding to the email, “[t]his is substantial evidence that the parties agreed to transact business via email.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).