CREST INFINITI, II, LP v. Swinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the apex doctrine because it shifts the 13 burden to the party seeking discovery
• unsworn statements, whether made by a forensic advocate or by the trial judge, do not constitute evidence
• “We decline to adopt a form of the apex doctrine that shifts a burden to the party seeking discovery. In Oklahoma, the burden of showing ‘good cause’ is statutorily placed on the party objecting to discovery and is part of that party’s motion for a protective order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).