Cress v. Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding it was proper to admit evidence that the defendant robbed patrons and employees of a bar at the same time he robbed the bar itself because it “directly prov[ed]” that he robbed the bar—the charged offense in that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).