Creson v. Amoco Production Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiffs did not dispute the type of cost deducted or whether the costs were not the actual costs or were inflated; plaintiffs conceded the carbon dioxide gas was marketable at the wellhead
• royalty based on \net proceeds” at the well allows for deduction of \post-production, value-enhancing costs”
• post-production costs are those associated with transporting the gas, expenses of compressing gas so that it can be delivered into a pipeline and other “costs incurred in adding value to the well-head product”
• marketability goes to issue of compliance with royalty obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).