Creshawn Dupri Howard v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an individual’s consent can be sufficient to dissipate the taint of a[ Fourth Amendment violation]”
• noting that some circuits have equated \reasonable belief\ with \probable cause\ while others have concluded that \reasonable belief\ means something less stringent than \probable cause\
• noting that some circuits have equated \reasonable belief\ with \probable cause\ while others have concluded that \reasonable belief\ means something less stringent than \probable cause\
• discussing numerous considerations in addition to the Broum factors in fruit of the poisonous tree case involving third-party consent
• \[W]e decline to reach a conclusion as to whether 'reason to believe' is as stringent as 'probable cause' ....\
• “noise coming from inside of a house is not enough to give the police a reason to believe that a defendant is present”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).