Crescenzi v. Supreme Court of State of NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent special circumstances, the Court may not retain jurisdiction pending resort to the state courts for [satisfaction of the exhaustion requirement].”
• “[A]bsent special circumstances, the Court may not retain jurisdiction pending resort to the state courts for [satisfaction of the exhaustion requirement].”
• “Petitioner will not be able to satisfy the ‘in custody’ requirement in a subsequent habeas action challenging the contempt finding. That circumstance, however, does not justify the retention of habeas corpus jurisdiction.”
• “It follows that the writ is not designed to assure petitioner of a federal forum for collateral attack upon his conviction where the exhaustion of state remedies does not take place until after he has been released from custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).