Skip to main content
· 10/5/1911

Crescent Hill Presbyterian Church v. McDonald & Dodd

Citations

  • 144 Ky. 655
  • 139 S.W. 849
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiff sought to recover for sales not made, or, in other words, sought the present value of its lost profits
  • Argument that accountant misapplied statistics in his proposed expert testimony went to weight of testimony
  • “[T]he place to question [an expert’s use] of his properly supported assumptions is at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lassing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.