Skip to main content
· 11/8/2000

Crepage v. City of Lauderhill

Citations

  • 774 So. 2d 61
  • 2000 WL 1671577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where Crepage only received twenty-four-hour notice of the hearing, the remedy was to set a new hearing with proper notice
  • holding that where Crepage only received twenty-four-hour notice of the hearing, the remedy was to set a new hearing with proper notice
  • twenty-four hours’ notice of adversarial hearing insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.