Skip to main content

Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

Citations

  • 471 S.E.2d 845
  • 267 Ga. 20
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2262
  • 1996 Ga. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under the circumstances, “notice by publication was not reasonably designed to [e]nsure that the wife [in a divorce action] had notice of the trial date”
  • holding that notice by publication was not reasonably designed to ensure that a pro se party received such notice and was inadequate to meet due process requirements when the court had a current out-of-state address of a party in a divorce action
  • abuse of the trial court's discretion found when court refused to set aside a final judgment obtained in the wife's absence
  • “[When] we are able to decide [a] case on a narrower basis, we do not reach the broader issues.”
  • “Where a judgment is entered in contravention of a party’s due process rights to notice, a trial court is authorized to set the judgment aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d).”
  • At final divorce hearing, the trial court must decide custody of the minor children, visitation rights and child support and “parties to the divorce action must be given reasonable opportunity to be heard on these issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Carley, Fletcher, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.