Cremins v. COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a planned unit development granted in Washington County under its zoning regulations amounts to a “zoning reclassification” for purposes of judicial review under Art. 66B, § 4.08, the companion section to § 2.09 for non-charter counties
• stating that Zoning Board decisions “are presumptively correct, if based upon substantial evidence, even if substantial evidence to the contrary exists”
• property owners waived argument that unsworn testimony before zoning authority should not be considered by failing to object at administrative hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).