Cremeans v. Maynard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating where evidence “conclusively shows lack of authority and where conflicting inferences cannot be drawn” the court may decide issues of agency
• stating where evidence “conclusively shows lack of authority and where conflicting inferences cannot be drawn” the court may decide issues of agency
• stating where evidence “conclusively shows lack of authority and where conflicting inferences cannot be drawn” the court may decide issues of agency
• question of fact presented as to whether out-of-state workers brought to job site by employer were within the scope of employment in firing shotguns at union picketers
• factual issue as to whether shooting of pickets was within the scope of employment
• “When the evidence is conflicting the question of whether the relation of principal and agent existed, and, if so whether the agent acted within the scope of his authority and in behalf of his principal are questions of fact for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).