Skip to main content
· 10/9/1997

Creighton v. Emporia Credit Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 981 F. Supp. 411
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16357
  • 1997 WL 650940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the collection notice's demand for immediate payment contradicted required statutory disclosure that debtor had thirty days to dispute debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spencer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.