Skip to main content

Creelman v. Svenning

Citations

  • 410 P.2d 606
  • 67 Wash. 2d 882
  • 1966 Wash. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Mitchelle, 39 Wash.2d 473, 236 P.2d 349, Anderson, 181 Wash. 327, 43 P.2d 39, and Yaselli, 12 F.2d 396
  • following Mitchelle, 39 Wn.2d 473, Arlderson, 181 Wash. 327, and Yaselli, 12 F.2d 396
  • the prosecuting attorney, as a quasi-judicial officer, is exempt from suit for tort for his official acts
  • the objectives for granting immunity would be destroyed if the prosecutor needed to be concerned with potential tort litigation against the county or state each time a prosecutorial decision was made
  • the objectives for granting immunity would be destroyed if the prosecutor needed to be concerned with potential tort litigation against the county or state each time a prosecutorial decision was made
  • common law prosecutorial immunity which shields judicial or quasi-judicial officers extends to municipal employer for acts of officers in the performance of duties which rest upon them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Creelman v. Svenning

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.