Washington Supreme Court· 1/27/1966
Creelman v. Svenning
Citations
- 410 P.2d 606
- 67 Wash. 2d 882
- 1966 Wash. LEXIS 861
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following Mitchelle, 39 Wash.2d 473, 236 P.2d 349, Anderson, 181 Wash. 327, 43 P.2d 39, and Yaselli, 12 F.2d 396
- following Mitchelle, 39 Wn.2d 473, Arlderson, 181 Wash. 327, and Yaselli, 12 F.2d 396
- the prosecuting attorney, as a quasi-judicial officer, is exempt from suit for tort for his official acts
- the objectives for granting immunity would be destroyed if the prosecutor needed to be concerned with potential tort litigation against the county or state each time a prosecutorial decision was made
- the objectives for granting immunity would be destroyed if the prosecutor needed to be concerned with potential tort litigation against the county or state each time a prosecutorial decision was made
- common law prosecutorial immunity which shields judicial or quasi-judicial officers extends to municipal employer for acts of officers in the performance of duties which rest upon them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-14· cited 147×
- Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 136×
- Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 132×
- Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1995-08-17· cited 78×
- Board of Com'rs of Delaware County v. BriggsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-12-03· cited 77×
- McDonald v. Lakewood Country ClubSupreme Court of Colorado· 1969-12-15· cited 63×
- Calhoun v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-08-07· cited 63×
- Wark v. Washington National GuardWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-17· cited 45×
- Janaszak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-07· cited 44×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Justice v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 39×
- Gilliam v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-26· cited 38×
- Gilliam v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-26· cited 36×
- Ruf v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 36×
- McDaniel v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2009-05-12· cited 34×
- Adkins v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-17· cited 28×
- Roy v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-06· cited 27×
- Layne v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-03-13· cited 23×
- Frost v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 20×
- Burr v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-12-19· cited 20×
- Bolin v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-02-01· cited 18×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Creelman v. Svenning
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.