Creel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a conviction where a four-day gap was unaccounted for before the crime lab received the evidence and where the individuals in charge of maintaining the evidence in those four days could not be identified
• “The chain of custody is composed of ‘links.’ A ‘link’ is anyone who handled the item. The State must identify each link from the time the item was seized.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2019-09-26· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Holton
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-11-22· cited 105×
• Suttle v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-02-23· cited 23×
• Ex Parte Garrett
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1992-06-26· cited 15×