Creed v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a federal district court could not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a VTCA claim, because the VTCA explicitly limits jurisdiction over claims to Virginia courts
• finding that the court could not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over VTCA claim because the VTCA explicitly limits jurisdiction over claims to Virginia Courts
• \Examples of a nominal party include a party with no assets or one that does not actively engage in business ...\
• “The VTCA explicitly limits jurisdiction over claims brought under the Act to Virginia courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).