Creech v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding error caused by State’s improper veracity questions was not reversible
• “[W]hen the appellant said that the officer was lying, he was merely saying that his version of the affair was correct and that of the officer incorrect. We see nothing in such answer which would tend to bring him into disrepute with the jury.”
• “[W]hen the appellant said that the officer was lying, he was merely saying that his version of the affair was correct and that of the officer incorrect. We see nothing in such answer which would tend to bring him into disrepute with the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Temple v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-21· cited 124×
• Reyes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 94×
• State v. Sorensen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-13· cited 37×
• Ayala v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-01-03· cited 21×
• Streff v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1994-11-03· cited 18×
• Lee Joseph v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-04-05· cited 18×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-04· cited 1×
• David Mark Temple v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-21
• Santos Joel Flores Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-04-17
• Juan Trevino v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2016-05-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rodrigues v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-11-06· cited 11×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-06-26· cited 8×