Creditwatch, Inc. v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that facts covered by other available remedies cannot be the basis of an IIED claim
• concluding that plaintiff’s claim for IIED was barred by preemption because it was based on numerous acts of sexual harassment, and thus, covered by 11 Chapter 21
• providing that even if other remedies do not explicitly preempt the tort of IIED, them availability leaves no gap to fill
• indicating that IIED claims must typically be based on circumstances that border on “serious criminal acts”
• providing that even if other remedies do not explicitly preempt the tort of IIED, their availability leaves no gap to fill
• indicating that IIED claims must typically be based on circumstances that border on ―serious criminal acts‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).