Creditor's Committee of Jumer's Castle Lodge, Inc. v. D. James Jumer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA] to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”
• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA] to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”
• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA], to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”
• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA] to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”
• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA] to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”
• “Because the IUFTA is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 U.S.C. § 548, as well as cases interpreting other states’ versions of the [UFTA], to determine the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).