Skip to main content
· 8/19/1980

Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Dubrock (In Re Dubrock)

Citations

  • 5 B.R. 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is not sufficient if one’s dependence on the car is limited to use for travel to and from work.”
  • “a car is classified a tool of trade only if the occupation of its owner is uniquely dependent on its use”
  • “Sales managers, an insurance adjuster, and various trade workers have also been deemed sufficiently in need of a vehicle to carry on their professions so as to permit their car to be considered a tool of their trade.” [Citations omitted]. Dubrock himself was a salesman of real estate
  • car for real estate broker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.