Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California Resident

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “SRO rules that have been approved by the Commission . . . preempt state law when the two are in conflict[.]”
• a motion that merely seeks to relitigate the issues underlying an original preliminary injunction order must be filed within Rule 59(e)’s time limit
• “[W]e review de novo any underlying issues of law, including the district court’s interpretation of [Arizona] state law.” (citation omitted)
• in a different context, 20 looking to the substance of a motion, not its caption
• “[W]e have long recognized ‘the well-established rule that a district judge always has power to modify or to overturn an interlocutory order or decision while it remains interlocutory.’ ”
• “If the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, the statutory analysis ends.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).