Skip to main content
· 6/30/2009

Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Davisson

Citations

  • 644 F. Supp. 2d 948
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73086
  • 2009 WL 2486934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the act of filing a debt collection lawsuit was not necessarily inconsistent with reliance on a similar arbitration provision
  • “agreement does not violate a plaintiff’s rights merely because it precludes a limited number of remedies”
  • “[An] overwhelming majority of courts have enforced class ac tion waivers [under Ohio law]”
  • “Given that Arbitration Clause contemplates a demand for arbitration being made after a lawsuit has commenced, Plaintiff’s act of filing a debt-collection suit in state court is not necessarily inconsistent with reliance on the Arbitration Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.