Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Davisson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the act of filing a debt collection lawsuit was not necessarily inconsistent with reliance on a similar arbitration provision
• “agreement does not violate a plaintiff’s rights merely because it precludes a limited number of remedies”
• “[An] overwhelming majority of courts have enforced class ac tion waivers [under Ohio law]”
• “Given that Arbitration Clause contemplates a demand for arbitration being made after a lawsuit has commenced, Plaintiff’s act of filing a debt-collection suit in state court is not necessarily inconsistent with reliance on the Arbitration Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. Hernandez
  C.D. California· 2015-04-30· cited 43×
• Brookdale Senior Living Inc. v. Stacy
  E.D. Kentucky· 2014-06-20· cited 26×
• Debois, Inc. v. Guy
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-22· cited 9×
• Garner v. BankPlus
  S.D. Mississippi· 2012-12-20· cited 3×
• In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation
  S.D. Florida· 2010-06-16· cited 1×
• Finish Line, Inc. v. Patrone
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-13· cited 1×
• Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Burson
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-04