Skip to main content
· 12/29/1976

Creative Development Corp. v. Bond

Citations

  • 367 A.2d 566
  • 34 Md. App. 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a foreclosure defendant could not circumvent the posting of a supersedeas bond by filing a separate action and invoking the doctrine of lis pendens
  • “[T]he law does not allow litigant parties to give to others, pending the litigation, rights to the property in dispute, so as to prejudice the opposite party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert, Powers, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.