Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he presence of a business justification ... is not appropriately raised at [the motion to dismiss] stage---- [The plaintiff] is not required to allege the negative of every possible justification [the defendant] may offer for its conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doron Precision Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, INC.
  S.D. New York· 2006-03-23· cited 67×
• Steward Health Care System, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
  D. Rhode Island· 2014-02-19· cited 15×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Grinnell Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 2,474×
• Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 1,936×
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,717×
• Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
• Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 751×
• Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 677×
• Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 412×
• Todd v. Exxon Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2001-12-20· cited 361×
• Elisha D. Hack v. The President And Fellows Of Yale College
  Second Circuit· 2000-12-28· cited 28×
• International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  S.D. New York· 1994-12-16· cited 22×
• Intellective, Inc. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
  S.D. New York· 2002-03-08· cited 13×
• Subsolutions, Inc. v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 1999-08-02· cited 6×

Other cases named Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.
  D. Kansas· 2000-02-16· cited 1×