Skip to main content
· 5/21/1997

Creations Unlimited, Inc. v. McCain

Citations

  • 112 F.3d 814
  • 1997 WL 219066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district “court properly applied the Lieb factors and also ‘considered the arguments put forth by the [defendants] in their memorandum brief’ before denying the [defendants’] motion”
  • “A district court has jurisdiction to rule on a motion for ancillary attorneys’ fees even after the filing of a notice of appeal with respect to the underlying claims.”
  • “A [trial] court has jurisdiction to rule on a motion for ancillary attorneys’ fees even after the filing of a notice of appeal with respect to the underlying claims.”
  • “A [trial] court has jurisdiction to rule on a motion for ancillary attorneys’ fees even after the filing of a notice of appeal with respect to the underlying claims.”
  • “A district court has jurisdiction to rule on a motion for ancillary attorneys’ fees even after the filing of a notice of appeal with respect to the underlying claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Wiener, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.