Skip to main content
· 10/9/1973

Creason v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 414 U.S. 863
  • 94 S. Ct. 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming abstention under Pullman where ambiguous “sections of the Union Township Zoning Ordinance” had “never been interpreted by the New Jersey courts”
  • “[I]t is unclear whether the term [‘motion picture theater’] encompasses only large, auditorium-style uses, as the Board found, or whether it could instead be read more broadly to also include private video viewing booths of the type involved here.”
  • “[Ajbstention is ‘the exception, not the rule.’ ”
  • land use issues implicate important state interests
  • describing three-step analysis of Pullman abstention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.