Crawley v. Kentucky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a response to requests for admission filed after the expiration of the discovery deadline
• “The proper course for [defendant] to have followed when [he] sought to utilize [requests for admissions] after the . . . discovery cut-off date, was to file a motion seeking an enlargement of the deadline for that specific purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).