Crawford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• bifurcated proceedings are necessary when the defendant is charged in separate counts with D.U.I. and with having been previously convicted of the same offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-10-17· cited 45×
• State v. Cottrell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-12-15· cited 33×
• Marsh v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1977-09-15· cited 18×
• Bryant v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1973-08-16· cited 16×
• State v. Mahoney
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1993-08-24· cited 14×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1980-11-25· cited 12×
• State v. Crawford
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1981-05-22· cited 11×
• State v. Ward
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1991-04-25· cited 8×
• Stone v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-11-01· cited 7×
• Freeman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-09-18· cited 5×
• Whitnel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1978-01-05· cited 2×
• State v. Michael Robinson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-01-19
• State v. McElyea
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-01-15