Crawford v. Southern Railway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• centralizing 21 actions concerning the oral anticoagulant Xarelto, where actions were pending in 10 districts and informal coordination was not practicable in light of \considerable growth in the litigation\ and number of involved firms
• ‘‘[T]he transferee court handling several cases in an MDL likely is in a better position—and certainly is in no worse position than courts in multiple districts handling individual cases—to properly address meritless claims.’”
• ‘‘[T]he transferee court handling several cases in an MDL likely is in a better position—and certainly is in no worse position than courts in multiple districts handling individual cases—to properly address meritless claims.’”
• centralizing 21 actions (more than 30 tag-alongs)
• centralizing 21 actions (more than 30 tag-alongs)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).