Crawford v. Shivashankar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the fact an expert witness merely states that his testimony is generally accepted does not make them so for the purpose of Frye analysis
• any error in the exclusion of expert’s medical opinion was harmless in that it would have been cumulative of the testimony of four other physicians
• thermogram photographs omitted from plaintiff's exhibit list were inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).