Crawford v. Nielson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because odd-lot workers are by definition not absolutely helpless, the mere fact of actual employment is not conclusive as to question of total permanent disability
• because odd-lot workers are by definition not absolutely helpless, the mere fact of actual employment is not conclusive as to question of total permanent disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 54×
• Arnold v. Splendid Bakery
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1965-04-19· cited 45×
• Bybee v. State, Indus. Special Indem.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-07-25· cited 26×
• Griffin v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-07-18· cited 14×
• Lane v. General Telephone Company of Northwest
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-11-15· cited 12×
• Martin Estate v. Woods
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-06-02· cited 8×
• Casger v. Fuger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1957-05-01· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-02-24· cited 97×
• Irvine v. Perry
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1956-06-27· cited 12×
• Carlson v. Small Leasing Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1950-12-14· cited 10×
• Anderson v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1955-12-13· cited 9×