· 1/9/1984
Crawford v. Mindel
Citations
- 469 A.2d 454
- 57 Md. App. 111
- 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Based on the fiduciary duty appellant Crawford owed to the corporation and the individual appellees, his conduct may be categorized as a classic example of constructive fraud, which usually arises from a breach of duty where a relationship of trust and confidence exists.”
- “Based on the fiduciary duty appellant Crawford owed to the corporation and the individual appellees, his conduct may be categorized as a classic example of constructive fraud, which usually arises from a breach of duty where a relationship of trust and confidence exists.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liss, Garrity and Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.