Crawford v. Chabot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that conflicts exist “between Minnesota unjust enrichment law and unjust enrichment law in other jurisdictions”
• “As a Minnesota corporation, Allianz can not [sic] claim surprise by the application of Minnesota law to conduct emanating from Minnesota.”
• “Because of the outcome of the choice-of-law analysis below, it is unnecessary to determine the precise number of outcome-determinative conflicts ... between Minnesota unjust enrichment law and unjust enrichment law in other jurisdictions. It is sufficient to recognize that conflicts exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).