Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 3/29/2002

Crawford-Mulley v. Corning Inc.

Citations

  • 194 F. Supp. 2d 212
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6605
  • 2002 WL 553808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “plaintiff’s speculation concerning the employer’s motivation is insufficient to establish pretext”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.