W.D. New York· 3/29/2002
Crawford-Mulley v. Corning Inc.
Citations
- 194 F. Supp. 2d 212
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6605
- 2002 WL 553808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “plaintiff’s speculation concerning the employer’s motivation is insufficient to establish pretext”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.