CRAWFORD, JAMIE L., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claim constructions rendering “dependent claims meaningless” are generally “disfa- vored”
• holding a con- struction that renders claim language “meaningless” is “disfavored”
• holding a con- struction that renders claim language “meaningless” is “disfavored”
• “‘[O]ptimiz[ing] . . . QoS’ is a ‘term of degree’ that . . . is ‘purely subjective’ . . . .”
• “‘[O]ptimiz[ing] . . . QoS’ is a ‘term of degree’ that . . . is ‘purely subjective’ . . . .”
• construction that renders dependent claims meaningless is “disfavored”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).