Skip to main content
· 12/27/2005

Crawford Central School District v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 888 A.2d 616
  • 585 Pa. 131
  • 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where an assignment is effective, “an assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Privity is not an issue in cases involving assignment claims; an assignee does not pursue a cause of action in its own right.” (citations omitted)
  • “ ‘Exclusions’ are given for tax paid on items not intended to be taxed in the first place.”
  • “ ‘Exemptions’ are given for the tax paid on items that, though ordinarily subject to taxation, are excused from taxation because certain criteria have been met.”
  • “[s]ince the facts are undisputed, we are left with a question of law”
  • addressing interpretation of the scope of an assignment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.